5-Year Impact Factor: 0.9
Volume 34, 12 Issues, 2024
  Meta-Analysis     December 2024  

Thymosin Alpha 1 Plus Routine Treatment for the Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

By Ailing Cao, Fanchao Feng, Xianmei Zhou

Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2024.12.1497

ABSTRACT
This systematic review was conducted to assess the curative effect of Thymosin alpha 1 in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients. Six electronic databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Chinese Biomedical Database, and Wanfang Database were searched for eligible papers focusing on the thymosin alpha 1 treatment in AECOPD patients. The effectiveness outcomes included T cell subset, pulmonary function, arterial blood gases, and the length of hospital stay. Stata and Review Manager Software were used for data analysis. Thirty-nine randomised controlled trials with a total of 3,329 patients were included. Compared with the control treatment, Thymosin alpha 1 therapy significantly improved forced expiratory volume in 1 second [MD = 0.29, 95% (0.26, 0.32), p <0.001] and the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity [MD = 6.24, 95% (3.83, 8.65), p <0.001], increased the arterial partial pressure of oxygen [MD = 7.24, 95% (3.42, 11.07), p = 0.0002], lowered the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [MD = -5.85, 95% (-9.38, -2.33), p = 0.001], shortened the length of hospital stay [MD = -5.39, 95% (-7.82, -2.97), p <0.001], raised the level of CD4+ T lymphocytes count [MD = 7.54, 95%(6.66, 8.41), p <0.001] and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ [MD = 0.40, 95% (0.34, 0.46), p <0.001], and decreased level of CD8+ T lymphocytes count [MD = -2.74, 95% (-3.86, -1.63), p <0.001]. Thymosin alpha 1 could significantly boost the immune function, and improve pulmonary function and arterial blood gas of AECOPD patients than routine treatment only. More high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to further confirm Thymosin alpha 1 efficacy.

Key Words: Thymosin alpha 1, Efficacy, Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is now one of the top three causes of death worldwide. Worldwide COPD affects 9-10% of the adult population and in Asian countries, such as China, the prevalence in people aged over 40 years is 13.7%.1 COPD represents an important public health challenge that is both preventable and treatable. A principal factor affecting COPD-related mortality is the acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Exacerbation contributes to the overall severity, including quality of life, rates of hospitalisation and readmission, and disease progression.
 

 At the moment, the conventional treatment protocol for AECOPD includes anti-infection, anti-inflammatory, bronchial expansion, mechanical ventilation, and respiratory therapy. The application of glucocorticoids is beneficial to patients. However, the effects of these measures are limited. High-dose glucocorticoids provide little benefit in terms of improving lung function and may have long-term detrimental effects.2 Approximately, one-third of patients with COPD experience one or more exacerbations every year.3 Hence, the clinical efficacy of AECOPD needs to be further improved.

In COPD there is a characteristic pattern of inflammation with increased numbers of neutrophils, macrophages, T-lymhocytes, and B-lymphocytes in the airway lumen. T-lymphocytes comprise a subpopulation of T CD4+ lymphocytes that regulate immune response through secretion of cytokines. A disruption in the regulatory mechanisms of the T-lymphocytes could result in the development and perpetuation of inflammation in COPD.4

Thymosin alpha 1 is a 28 amino acid peptide originally isolated from the thymus that has been recognised for modifying, enhancing, and restoring the immune function. It is a peptide hormone that is endogenously produced by the thymus gland and potentiates T cell-mediated immune responses via differentiation and maturation of T-cell progenitor cells, activation of dendritic and natural killer cells, and stimulation of cytokine-mediated inflammation.5 The synthetic form of thymosin alpha 1, thymalfasin, is approved in more than 35 countries for the treatment of immunocompromised states and malignancies, as an enhancer of vaccine response, and as a means of curbing morbidity and mortality in sepsis and numerous infections. Clinical trials had confirmed that Thymosin alpha 1, could enhance the immune function of AECOPD patients, suppress the inflammatory reaction, and ameliorate the patients’ quality of life and pulmonary function.6,7 Nevertheless, no relevant evidence-based evaluations have been published until now. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to integrate information presented in studies on the effectiveness of Thymosin α1 in the treatment of AECOPD patients.

METHODOLOGY

This systematic review was conducted following the reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Published researches were retrieved from six databases, including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, and Chinese Biomedical Database (from established to August 2023). The first two authors independently searched studies in electronic databases. The search strategy was as follows:

1 "Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive"[Mesh Terms]

2 "Lung Diseases, Obstructive"[MeSH Terms]

3 COPD [Title/Abstract] OR COAD [Title/Abstract] OR chronic obstructive airway disease [Title/Abstract] OR chronic obstructive lung disease [Title/Abstract] OR chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [Title/Abstract] OR chronic obstructive airflow disease [Title/Abstract] OR chronic obstructive respiratory disease [Title/Abstract] OR emphysema [Title/Abstract] OR chronic bronchitis [Title/Abstract] OR chronic airflow obstruction [Title/Abstract]

4, 1 or 2 or 3

5 thymosin [Title/Abstract]) OR thymosin alpha 1 [Title/Abstract]) thymalfasin [Title/Abstract])

6, 4, and 5

The criteria for the studies to be included in the meta-analysis were as follows: All patients in study were diagnosed as AECOPD according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria; type of study was randomised controlled trial (RCT); the experimental group was given Thymosin alpha 1 plus routine complex treatment, whereas the intervention in the control group was routine complex treatment; at least one of the following outcomes was required in the present study: T cell subset, pulmonary function, arterial blood gases, and / or the length of hospital stay. Relevant studies were manually removed if any of the following criteria were identified: Duplicated articles; Incomplete literature information; studies whose baseline data were significantly inconsistent.

The primary indicator of the present study was the T cell subset, including percentages of CD4+ T lymphocytes, CD8+ T lymphocytes, and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+. The secondary indicators were arterial blood gases (arterial partial pressure of oxygen and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide), the length of hospital stay, and pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in the first second and the ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity).

The first two authors independently extracted data from the studies included. Data extracted from eligible studies included the first author’s name, publication date, study characteristics, and participants’ characteristics (age, sample size, details of interventions, and outcomes). If different results were generated, the third author assessed the differences in the forms and had discussion between the first and second authors to come to an agreement.

The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed independently by first two authors based on the criteria in the Cochrane evaluation handbook of RCTs 5.1.0,8 which included five parameters: Sequence generation; allocation concealment; blinding of participants and study personnel and blinding of outcome assessments; incomplete outcome data; and selective outcome reporting. The studies were graded as having low, high, or unclear risk of bias. This course had to be cross-checked in order to ensure accuracy and reliability. The disagreements between the two investigators were resolved by consultation with the third author.

The RevMan 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration) and Stata 14.0 software were used to calculate the statistical analysis. As continuous variables, pulmonary function, arterial blood gases, length of hospital stay, and T cell subset were assessed using mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% CIs. I2 statistics were used to assess the statistical heterogeneity among studies. The random model was conducted in the presence of heterogeneity (I2 ≥50%). Otherwise, the fixed model was used (I2 <50%). The statistical significance was assessed for p <0.05. Funnel plot and Egger’s regression asymmetry test were performed to detect potential publication bias. Evidence of asymmetry from Egger’s test was considered to be significant at p <0.1, A value of p <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivity analysis was performed by sequential omission of individual studies and re-conducting meta-analysis of the remaining studies.

RESULTS

Based on the search criteria, the initial database search identified 443 potentially relevant possible studies. A total of 54 Records were identified after removing duplicates and screening the titles and abstracts. Fifteen trials were excluded for the following reasons: Retrospective study (n = 6), no relative outcomes (n = 8), and duplicate data (n = 1). Finally, 39 clinical trials were involved in this meta-analysis. The flowchart of the detailed searching steps for this meta-analysis is described in Figure 1.

Table I: Baseline characteristics of included studies.

Study, year

Age, years (Mean ± SD/range)

Sample size (N)

Interventions

Course of treatment

Outcome

Jia et al. 20159

T:70.10 ± 5.65;
C:69.86 ± 5.19

T:42
C:42

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: placebo+the routine complex treatment

4 weeks

①②③

Wu 201910

79.6 ± 3.7;
80.2 ± 4.4

31/29

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

C: Antibiotics, conventional treatment

10 - 14d

Sun et al. 201911

73.02 ± 4.22;
72.54 ± 3.65

48/48

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

Fan YJ 201712

51.7 ± 2.19;
45.2 ± 3.16

46/46

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

12 weeks

Xie 201613

67. 71 ± 12. 39;
67. 64 ± 12. 33

30/30

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

Tong et al. 201314

67.1 ± 7.2;
69.4 ± 4.5

43/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

7d

①②③

Fan 201715

70.35 ± 3.47;
69.40 ± 3.12

45/45

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

①②

Yang et al. 201816
 

58.44 ± 7.26;
58.12 ± 7.25

40/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

Zhou 201817
 

64.54 ± 4.58;
64.64 ± 4.60

39/39

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

Yu 201818

57.9 ± 6.5;
58.4 ± 7.8

35/35

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①②③

Ye 201919

67.3 ± 4.8;
67.0 ± 4.5

53/52

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①②

 

Hu 201820

76.37 ± 8.04;
74.13 ± 7.51

30/30

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

4 weeks

 

Wang et al. 201721

59.67 ± 3.25;
58.62 ± 4.31

50/50

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

Shao 201922

 

66.34 ± 6.13;
66.7 5± 6.74

33/32

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

 

Zhang 201623

70.5 ± 2.7;
70.8 ± 2.5

45/45

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

8-10d

 

Zhao et al. 201624
 

53.4±6.1;
 54.1±6.3

30/30

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①②

Cai 201925

62.8 ± 8.3;
62.7 ± 8.2

33/32

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

7d

Jin 201826

74.5 ± 2.8;
73.8 ± 2.6

43/43

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

7d

①②

Guo 201627

71.47 ± 4.12;
71.35 ± 4.26

25/25

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

 

Quan 201928

73.30 ± 0.28;
73.24 ± 0.26

44/43

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①②

Wang 201929

71.98 ± 5.66;
71.54 ± 4.34

35/35

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

8-10d

 

Zhang 202030

70.4 ± 2.5;
70.5 ± 2.4

35/35

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

7-14d

 

Zhao et al. 201831

69.5 ± 2.6;
69.9 ± 2.7

65/65

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;

C: the routine complex treatment

8-10d

 

Peng 201532

70.5 ± 9.8;
69.0 ± 9.5

67/67

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

 

Cui et al. 201233

65-85;
67-84

15/15

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

7d

Jiao et al. 201734

70.82 ± 2.20;
70.23 ± 2.23

41/41

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

8d

Liu 201435

68.7 ± 4.9;
67.9 ± 5.2

40/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①②③

Li J 201836

40-87;
43-85

42/42

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

②③

Lin et al. 201637

65.27 ± 4.21;
62.86 ± 5.87

40/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

①②

Le 201338

69.2 ± 2.3;
69.7 ± 2.6

40/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

8-10d

Wu et al. 201739

63.4 ± 4.2;
64.5 ± 4.8

38/37

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

①②③

Jiang 201840

68.53 ± 8.29;
69.47 ± 8.19

133/124

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

7d

①②

Yu et al. 201741

65.5 ± 6.8;
65.3 ± 6.4

44/44

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

①②③

Ju 201642

65.2 ± 2.4;
65.4 ± 2.6

46/42

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①②

Su 201843

53.4 ± 3.2;
53.4 ± 3.2

30/30

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

Li et al. 200744

70.7 ± 11.7;

69.9 ± 12.3

56/52

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

Liu et al. 201445

71.8 ± 9.76;

69.6 ± 8.81

60/60

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

 

14d

①④

Shao 201346

NR

40/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

14d

①④

Jin et al. 201247

71.2 ± 19.8;

74 ± 23.4

37/40

T: Tα1+the routine complex treatment;
C: the routine complex treatment

10d

①④

T: Treatment group; C: Control group; ① T Cell subset ② Lung function; ③ Arterial blood gases; ④ Hospital stay; NR: Not reported.

Figure 1: Flow diagram of the literature search process.

A total of thirty-nine randomised controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis (Table I). All the studies used thymosin alpha 1 with routine complex treatment as the experimental group and routine complex treatment as the control group. Routine complex treatment can consist of antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, bronchial expansion, and resolving the phlegm. The duration of therapy was 1 to 12 weeks by intravenous or subcutaneous injection.

According to the criteria in the Cochrane Evaluation Handbook of RCTs, the methodological quality evaluation forms were formulated. The randomisation method used was described in 25 (64.1%) articles. The remaining trials only mentioned randomisation but failed to describe the method of randomisation. Two trials described the process of allocation concealment in sufficient detail.9,34 Only one trial claimed to have used the blinded method.9 The risk of outcome assessment was unclear. All the included trials had an unclear risk of bias of incomplete outcome data because insufficient information was provided. Other bias was evaluated as an unclear risk. The risk of bias assessment of all included studies was shown in Figure 2.

Twenty-five studies including CD4+ T lymphocytes count9,13-21,24, 26,33-35,37,39-42,44-47 and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+9,13-21,24-26,33-35,37,39-41,44-47 were evaluated after treatment. As the test of heterogeneity was 74% and 93%, respectively, a random effects model was used for the test. The meta-analysis revealed that the CD4+ T lymphocytes count [MD = 7.54, 95% (6.66, 8.41), p <0.001] and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+[MD = 0.40, 95% (0.34, 0.46), p <0.001] significantly raised after treatment. The CD8+ T lymphocyte count was reported in 22 trials of 1927 patients.9,13,14,16-18,20,21,24,33-35,37,39-42,44-47 There was statistical heterogeneity between the 2 groups (I2 = 92%). The meta-analysis results revealed that the CD8+ T lymphocytes count significantly decreased after the treatment [MD = -2.74, 95% (-3.86, -1.63), p <0.001] (Figure 3). Considering the lack of literature and relevant data, the authors did not conduct subgroup analyses.

Figure 2: Risk of methodological bias of the included studies. Figure 3: Forest plot. (A) CD4(B) CD4+/CD8C) CD8+. Figure 4: Forest plot. (A) FEV1 (B) FEV1/FVC.

Twenty-three studies including 1,881 patients of AECOPD patients were evaluated for the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1).9-12,15,18,19,23,24,26-31,35-39,41-43 The ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first second to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) was evaluated and analysed in 15 studies.9,11,14,15,18, 24,27-29,35-37,39,40 The test of heterogeneity was 63% and 97% (p <0.01), respectively, suggesting that a random-effects model was preferred. Due to the significant heterogeneity, a subgroup analysis was conducted according to the duration of treatment to explore the sources of heterogeneity. This meta-analysis indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups for FEV1 [MD = 0.29, 95% (0.26, 0.32), p <0.001] and FEV1/FVC [MD = 6.24, 95% (3.83, 8.65), p <0.001], which revealed that thymosin α1 was beneficial to the improvement of pulmonary function (Figure 4).

Seven studies involving 564 participants were included in the meta-analysis to explore the impact of thymosin alpha 1 on arterial blood gases by random-effects model.9,14,18,35,36,39,41

Figure 5: Forest plot. (A) the partial pressure of the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (B) the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (C) length of hospital stay.
  Figure 6: Sensitivity analysis. (A) CD4(B) CD8+.

The results of the pooled analysis indicated that thymosin alpha 1 significantly increased the arterial partial pressure of oxygen [MD = 7.24, 95% (3.42, 11.07), p = 0.0002, I2 = 89%] and lowered the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [MD = -5.85, 95% (-9.38, -2.33), p = 0.001, I2 = 94%] (Figure 5). A total of three studies involving 237 patients presented length of hospital stay.35,46,47 The test of heterogeneity was 68% (p = 0.05), suggesting that a random-effects model was preferred. As shown in Figure 5, the pooled results suggested a significant difference for the length of hospital stay [MD = -5.39, 95% (-7.82, -2.97), p <0.001].

A single study involved in the meta-analysis was deleted each time, and the rest was reanalysed, resulting in similar results compared with the previous ones, indicating that the present study’s results were statistically robust. For further verification, the authors implemented a sensitivity analysis of the CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte count by Stata 14.0. Figure 6 indicated that the outcomes were very similar, and had relatively good stability. The funnel plot was applied to assess the publication bias of studies that included the results of the CD4+ T lymphocyte count in this meta-analysis, which showed a significant asymmetry. Egger’s test was further performed to assess publication bias. The results for CD4+ T lymphocyte count (p = 0.064) revealed that publication bias might exist in the present study.

DISCUSSION

Recently, accumulated evidence has suggested that autoimmune response plays an important role in the pathogenesis of COPD, and T lymphocytes are believed to be the key cells in regulating airway inflammation in COPD.48 T lymphocytes subpopulation can be subdivided into T helper lymphocytes and T inhibiter lymphocytes. CD4+ T lymphocytes are a marker for T helper lymphocytes. CD4+ T lymphocytes can activate T lymphocytes and participate in inducing cellular immune responses. CD8+ T lymphocytes are a marker of T inhibiter lymphocytes. CD8+ T lymphocytes have cytotoxic effects and exert inhibitory effects on T lymphocytes’ activity.49 Many animal experiments have verified that thymosin alpha 1 stimulated precursor stem cells into the CD4+/CD8+ T cells, promoted T-cell maturation, meanwhile modulated lymphocyte phenotypic marker expression and immune response.50 This meta-analysis revealed that the CD4+ T lymphocytes count and the ratio of CD4+/CD8+ significantly raised after treatment, while the CD8+ T lymphocyte count significantly decreased after treatment. These results suggested that thymosin alpha 1 could enhance the activity of helper T cells, consequently improving cellular immune function and anti-infection ability.

The results of the meta-analysis showed that the arterial partial pressure of oxygen and carbon dioxide, and the indices of pulmonary function (FEV1 and FEV1/FVC) in the experimental group were significantly improved after treatment. AECOPD is characterised by a sudden worsening of COPD symptoms, which typically leads to decreased lung function, an increased incidence of respiratory failure, and even death. Some studies have shown that increased numbers of CD8+ T cells and reduced ratio of CD4+/CD8+ T cells in COPD patients have been correlated with a decline in lung function.51 An inability to upregulate Tregs could lead to a more rapid development of emphysema, and thus to a more rapid decline in lung function.52 On the other hand, thymosin alpha 1 specifically potentiates immune tolerance in the lung, often breaking the vicious circle that perpetuates chronic lung inflammation in response to a variety of infectious noxae.53 Hence, thymosin alpha 1 might be adopted in improving pulmonary function and arterial blood gas with AECOPD patients.

This study has certain limitations. First, the bias risk of many studies was unknown. Risk of bias assessments for the randomisation and concealment allocation were frequently inadequate. Second, the thymosin alpha 1 intervention protocol, including frequency and sessions, varied greatly across studies. This could influence the reliability of the pooled effect sizes and make it difficult for the review authors to draw a definitive conclusion about the optimal recommendation. Third, the meta-analysis showed considerable evidence of heterogeneity between trials. The average illness severity, and age differed from trial-to-trial and the diversity of treatment options might be the source of heterogeneity. Considering the lack of literature and relevant data, the authors did not conduct subgroup analyses. Therefore, more well-designed trials in the near future are a feasible solution to remedy this flaw.
 

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of thymosin alpha 1 in the acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients. Thirty-nine randomised controlled trials including 3,329 patients were included in the analysis, which ensured adequacy specimen to precisely evaluate the efficacy. By the results of this meta-analysis, the authors concluded that thymosin alpha 1 plus routine treatment could more efficiently enhance the immune function, and improve pulmonary function, and arterial blood gas of AECOPD patients than routine treatment only. However, some big international multi-centred and high-quality RCTs are urgently needed to further prove the efficacy.

COMPETING INTEREST:
The authors declared no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION:
XZ, AC: Conceived and designed the project.
AC, FF: Performed the review and analysed the data.
AC: Wrote the paper.
XZ: Was responsible for quality control of the study.
All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.

REFERENCES

  1. Wang C, Xu J, Yang L, Xu Y, Zhang X, Bai C, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in China (the China Pulmonary Health [CPH] study): A national cross-sectional study. Lancet 2018; 391(10131):1706-17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30 841-9.
  2. Riley CM, Sciurba FC. Diagnosis and outpatient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A review. JAMA 2019; 321(8):786-97. doi:10.1001/jama.2019. 0131.
  3. Dobler CC, Morrow AS, Farah MH, Beuschel B, Majzoub AM, Wilson ME, et al. Nonpharmacologic therapies in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95(6):1169-83. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.01.018.
  4. Hou J, Sun Y. Role of regulatory t cells in disturbed immune homeostasis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Front Immunol 2020; 11:723. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00723.
  5. Dominari A, Hathaway IiiD, Pandav K, Matos W, Biswas S, Reddy G, et al. Thymosin alpha 1: A comprehensive review of the literature. World J Virol 2020; 9(5):67-78. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v9.i5.67.
  6. Wu XL, Wang H, Ge L. The curative effect of thymosin-α1 in the adjuvant treatment of senile patients with AECOPD: A Meta-analysis. Chinese J Clinicians 2015; 9(1):93-9. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2015.01. 013.     
  7. Chen YH, Feng CL, Wang J, Wang W, Xie JG, Yin Y. Expert consensus on immunomodulatory therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese General Practice 2022; 25(24):2947-59. doi: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572. 2022.0384.
  8. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available form: http://www.cochrane.org/ training/cochrane hand book.2011.
  9. [9] Jia Z, Feng Z, Tian R, Wang Q, Wang LYl. Thymosin α1 plus routine treatment inhibit inflammatory reaction and improve the quality of life in AECOPD patients. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2015; 37(4):388. doi: 10.3109/08923973.2015.1069837.
  10. Wu XP. Efficacy evaluation of antibiotics combined with thymosin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly patients. Modern Med Health Res 2019; 3(18):59-61. doi: CNKI:SUN:XYJD.0.2019-18-027.
  11. Sun W, Li BX, Zhang M. Clinical study of antibiotic combined with thymosin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Healthful Friend 2019; 9(17):24.
  12. Fan YJ. Clinical study of antibiotic combined with thymosin in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. J North Pharmacy 2017; 14(1):34-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 1672-8351.2017.01.025.
  13. Xie X. Effect of thymosin α1 on cellular and humoral immune function in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Pulmonary Med 2016; 21(6):1031-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663. 2016.06.019.
  14. Tong WN, Zhuo AS, Cao YS, Xu SL. Clinical observation of thymosin α1 adjuvant therapy in acute exacerbation of elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Pharmacist 2013; 16(4):600-3. doi: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2018.24.005.
  15. Fan HJ. The clinical efficacy of thymosin α1 adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Current Med 2017; 23(32):117-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393. 2017.32.051.
  16. [16] Yang XY, Liu Y. Effects of thymosin on T lymphocyte subsets in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese J Convalescent Medicine 2018; 27(10):92-3. doi: 10.13517/j.cnki.ccm. 2018.10.037.
  17. Zhou X. Effect of thymosin on T lymphocyte subsets in acute exacerbation of COPD. Clin Res Prac 2019; 3(34):57-8. doi: 10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.201834022.
  18. Yu CH. Effect of thymosin on T lymphocyte subsets in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Pulmonary Med 2016; 21(4):670-3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663.2016.04.026.
  19. Ye ZY. Effect of thymosin on T lymphocyte subsets in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clinical Medicine 2019; 6(65):67-8.
  20. Hu DN. The effect of thymosin on cellular immunity in patients with stable COPD. Hangzhou Normal University. 2018.
  21. Wang CX, Wang XH, Wang Y, Bi XM, Dong HQ. The effect of thymosin on immune function in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. World Latest Medical Information Abstracts 2017; 17(31):165.
  22. Shao LQ. Effect analysis of thymosin combined with antibiotics on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly. Health Readings 2019; 12(34):137-8.
  23. Zhang LY. Thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Modern Diagnosis Therapy 2016; 27(3):502-3. doi: CNKI:SUN:XDZD.0. 2016-03-074.
  24. Zhao ZY, Xie YT, Gao X. Clinical efficacy of thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly patients. Chinese J Primary Medicine 2016; 23(16):2537-41. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706. 2016.16.036.
     
  25. Cai ZQ. Therapeutic effect of thymosin combined with antibiotics in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary infection, Capital Food and Medicine 2019; 9(17):63. doi:10.3969/ j.issn.1005-8257.2019.17.053.
  26. Jin X. Application analysis of thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the elderly. Chinese Medicine Guide 2018; 16(3):73-4. doi: CNKI:SUN:YYXK.0.2018-03-060.
  27. Guo X. The application of thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly. Chinese J Health Nutrition 2016; 26(30):244-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn. 1004-7484.2016.30.390.
  28. Quan AF. Effectiveness of thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drug Evaluation 2019; 16(24):63-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2809.2019.24.035.
  29. Wang LH. Therapeutic effect analysis of thymosin combined with cefazolin sodium pentahydrate in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. China Practical Medicine 2019; 14(19):2. doi: 10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2019.19.055.
  30. Zhang SJ. Effect of combined administration of thymosin and cephazolin pentahydrin sodium on pulmonary function in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Doctors 2020; 10:375-6.
  31. Zhao XD, Wang LL. Clinical efficacy of thymosin combined with cefezolin pentahydrin sodium in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anti-infective Pharmacy 2018; 15(10):1684-6. doi: 10.13493/j.issn.1672-7878.2018. 10-008.
  32. Peng AH. Therapeutic effect of thymosin combined with meloxicillin on elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Contemporary Med 2015; 13(22):159-60. doi: CNKI:SUN:QYWA. 0.2015-22-137.
  33. Cui DP, Zhou W, Qi ZY. Effect of thymosin α1 on cellular immune function in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Strait Pharmacy 2012; 24(4):153-4. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3765. 2012.04.081.
  34. Jiao JH. Effect of thymosin α1 on cellular immune function in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Theory Prac 2017; 30(22):3347-8. doi: 10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2017.22. 027.
  35. Liu H. Efficacy of thymosin α1 in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly patients. Shandong Med 2014; 54(33):50-1. doi: CNKI:SUN:SDYY.0.2014-33-023.
  36. Li J. Clinical efficacy on inflammatory factors and lung function of thymosin α1 in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Chinese Modern Doctor 2018; 56(34):28-31. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZDYS.0.2018- 34-008.
  37. Lin YZ, Yan H, Chen HW. Effects of thymosin on cellular immune function in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Pulmonary Med 2016; 21(7):1216-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6663. 2016.07.015.
  38. Le YH. Efficacy and safety of thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly patients. Chinese J Gerontology 2013; 33(19):4703-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2013.19.018.
  39. Wu XZ, Yuan F. The role of thymosin in the clinical treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J North Sichuan Med Coll 2017; 32(6): 923-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3697.2017.06.034.
  40. [Jiang R. Clinical efficacy of thymosin on immune function in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Modern Diagnosis Treatment 2018; 29(3): 449-50. doi: CNKI:SUN:XDZD.0.2018-03-057.
  41. Yu HX, Cai DD. Clinical study on the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with thymosin and antimicrobial agents. Laboratory Med Clinic 2017; 14(14):2146-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672- 9455.2017.14.055.
  42. Ju J. Clinical effect of thymosin combined with antibiotics on elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Pharmaceutical Economics 2016; 11(8):67-8. doi: CNKI:SUN:ZYWA.0. 2016-08-025.
  43. Su CZ. Clinical effect on pulmonary function of thymosin combined with antibiotics in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Women’s Health Research 2018; 4(7):44-8. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096- 0417.2018.07.023.
  44. Li CH, Wang CH, Meng QH, Ye XL, Wang XJ, Jiang C. Effect of thymosin α1 on immune function in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese J Hospital Pharmacy 2007; 27(5):637-9. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-5213.2007.05.026.
  45. Liu MC, Liu L, Song D. The effect of thymosin α1 on acute onset of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in elderly patients. Southwest National Med J 2014; 24(6):598-601. doi: CNKI:SUN:XNGF.0.2014-06-009.
  46. Shao W. Thymosin α1 in the treatment of 40 elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese J Gerontology 2013; 14:3488-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2013.14.118.
  47. Jin YK, Ye XW, Xu YJ. Effects of thymosin α1 on cellular immune function in elderly patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese J Experimental Diagnostics 2012; 16(12):2268-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2012.12.039.
  48. Sun J, Liu T, Yan Y, Huo K, Zhang W, Liu H, et al. The role of Th1/Th2 Cytokines played in regulation of specific CD4+ Th1 cells conversion and activation during inflammatory reaction of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Scand J Immunol 2018; 88(1):e12674. doi: 10.1111/sji.12674.
  49. [Yan ZY, Liu NX, Mao XX, Li Y, Li CT. Activation effects of polysaccharides of flammulina velutipes mycorrhizae on the T lymphocyte immune function. J Immunol Res 2014; 4:e285421. doi: 10.1155/2014/285421.
  50. Shao C, Tian G, Huang Y, Liang W, Zheng H, Wei J, et al. Thymosin alpha-1-transformed bifidobacterium promotes T cell proliferation and maturation in mice by oral administration. Int Immunopharmacol 2013; 15(3):646-53. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2012.12.031.
  51. Wang CY, Ding HZ, Tang X, Li ZG. Effect of Liuweibuqi capsules on CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells, helper T cells and lung function in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with lung Qi deficiency. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10(5):2700-11. doi: 10. 21037/jtd.2018.04.110.
  52. Strm JE, Pourazar J, Linder R, Blomberg A, Lindberg A, Bucht A, et al. Airway regulatory T cells are decreased in COPD with a rapid decline in lung function. Resp Res 2020; 21(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01593-9.
  53. Camerini R, Garaci E. Historical review of thymosin α 1 in infectious diseases. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2015; 15 (Suppl 1):S117-27. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.1033393.